This is an addendum to Trumpkin’s Notes On Building A Sauna which should be read for more information.
IR vs Sauna
First, IR Booths are not sauna. This despite the misappropriation of the name by IR marketing people trying to piggyback on sauna and mislead consumers. There are some outward similarities but fundamentally they are quite different.
A sauna is a room heated by stones upon which water is thrown to create steam and control the humidity. This steam, along with pure fresh air, and even convective heat around your entire body result in the löyly (good sauna environment) that sauna is known for.
IR booths do not have the capability of löyly:
- IR booths are radiant heat, not convective heat. A sauna is just the opposite, it’s about convective heat, not radiant heat. These two types of heat are very different.
- IR booths do not have stones nor do you throw water on imaginary stones to create steam.
Sauna and IR booths are however somewhat similar on a surface level and, despite what some say, one is not necessarily better than the other. In both you are in an enclosed space, your body is being heated and you should sweat. Both frequently have walls, ceilings and benches of wood. That though is about it for similarities.
The experience between IR and sauna is quite different, how our bodies react is different and the health benefits are different.
Heat – In a sauna your experience is primarily that of convection heat (and conduction via condensation from the steam) while in an IR cabin you are heated by radiant heat. Good sauna builders try to reduce radiant heat as best they can.
Löyly – In a sauna you throw water on the stones to temporarily (except in American saunas with poor ventilation) increase the humidity and experience löyly. Repeated every few minutes provides an experience of humid/dry/humid/dry/humid/dry that is very enjoyable, comforting and healthy (similar to hot/cold/hot/cold/hot/cold being both comforting and likely the primary health benefit). Löyly is a core element of sauna and something that you don’t have in an IR cabin.
Dry vs Humid – An IR cabin is purely a very dry heat. Sauna is naturally dry but throwing water on the stones temporarily creates a more humid environment (though not as humid as a Turkish Bath or Steam Room).
Evenness – Your body experiences more even convective warmth all around in sauna (again, Finnish sauna, as many American saunas are extremely uneven) vs IR that is much less even and often only on 3 sides. Many of the health benefits of sauna such as improved immunity and cardiovascular system as well as the enjoyment are from the cycling of hot/cold/hot/cold/hot/cold. This is not as possible nor as comfortable with IR because with IR the heat is only skin deep and always dry.
Full Body vs Skin Deep – In a sauna you are breathing much warmer air so your respiratory system is experiencing something similar to the rest of your body – you’re more even inside and outside. In an IR cabin your skin is experiencing much greater warmth than your respiratory system.
Health – The differences in health benefits are unknown. While there is good information on sauna, there is very little on IR cabins. Some info on NIR and FIR treatments is appropriated for IR cabins but it’s not necessarily the same so be cautious. My guess is a bit of overlap of a few benefits and then a few that are exclusive to one or the other.
One studied benefit is using FIR for Waon Therapy to improve respiratory function for people with COPD. Other health benefits are being studied so as time goes on we’ll know more.
Space – An IR booth is by necessity quite small as you need to be near the IR panels to get any benefit. Saunas are generally much larger and can be as large as you want.
Social vs Solitary – Sauna is as much a social experience as anything. It is meant to be enjoyed with others. IR cabins are by necessity solitary – you need to be surrounded by the IR panels which prevents you from being surrounded by family or friends.
IR Cabin vs Finnish Sauna vs American Sauna
There is a much greater difference between a Finnish sauna vs IR than a typical American sauna vs IR. An American sauna with poor ventilation, low ceiling, low benches, seating too close to the heater and in particular if it has a heavy steel high radiant stove is, from an enjoyment standpoint, not much different than IR. A proper Finnish Sauna is, for most people, much more enjoyable.
Some vendors sell combination IR and Sauna units. From an IR standpoint these likely work just as well as any IR Booth/Cabin. The sauna experience is quite compromised though. One problem is that the IR panels reduce the amount of exposed wood surface in the sauna which reduces the hygrothermic benefit of soft wood. These panels also produce direct radiant heat, even when turned off, when heated by the sauna heater. This is uncomfortable and results in uneven heating both of which we want to avoid in a sauna.
Is EMF A Concern?
Every heat source (and really everything) in the world emits EMF, including every light bulb and every surface in your home. And each of us. And sauna heaters. Here’s an image of the EMF spectrum. IR is just to the left of visible light.
Whether the EMF emitted in an IR booth is harmful or not we kind of really don’t know as we’re still learning about physiology and how our bodies and the world around us interact. Personally I’d have few concerns using an IR booth a few times a year. Similar to getting x-rays though, I’d not do it weekly or daily, though for IR I’ve no solid data to say why. I might be more concerned about an induction range than an IR booth though.